Mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 215:24

אי הכי גבי העלאה נמי הא כתיב ההוא מיבעי ליה

OFFERING UP IS MORE STRINGENT: TWO WHO HOLD A KNIFE AND SLAUGHTER [WITHOUT] ARE NOT CULPABLE, [WHEREAS] IF THEY TAKE HOLD OF A LIMB AND OFFER IT UP, THEY ARE CULPABLE. IF ONE OFFERED UP, THEN OFFERED UP AGAIN, THEN OFFERED UP AGAIN,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Each time part of the same animal. He offered them up in ignorance, but between each offering he became aware that it was forbidden, and then forgot.');">¹⁴</span> HE IS CULPABLE IN RESPECT OF EACH [ACT OF] OFFERING UP: THESE ARE THE WORDS OF R'SIMEON. R'JOSE SAID: HE IS LIABLE ONLY TO ONE [SIN-OFFERING]. HE IS LIABLE ONLY WHEN HE OFFERS UP ON THE TOP OF AN ALTAR;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., he must first build an altar without and then offer up upon it.');">¹⁵</span> R'SIMEON SAID: HE IS LIABLE EVEN IF HE OFFERS UP ON THE TOP OF A ROCK OR A STONE. <big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>Why is offering up to a man [without] different, that it is not culpable? [presumably] because unto the Lord is written!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XVII, 8f: Whatsoever man . . offereth up a burnt-offering . . and bringeth it not unto the door of the tent of meeting to sacrifice it unto the Lord, even that man shall be cut off from his people. 'Unto the Lord' shews that Scripture speaks of one who is offering to God, not to man, and only then does he incur kareth (or, a sin-offering if he acts in ignorance) .');">¹⁶</span> Then in the case of slaughtering too, surely 'unto the Lord' is written?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. 3f: What man soever . . killeth all ox . . and hath not brought it unto the door of the tent of meeting, to present it as an offering unto the Lord.');">¹⁷</span> - There it is different, because Scripture saith, 'What man soever'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Heb. ish ish, lit., a man, a man', The repetition extends the law even to one who slaughters to a human being.');">¹⁸</span> 'What man soever' is written in connection with offering up too? - That is required for teaching that when two men offer up a limb, they are liable. If so, [say that] here too it is required for teaching that if two men hold the knife and slaughter, they are liable? - There it is different, because Scripture saith, that [man]:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. and that man shall be cut off from among his people.');">¹⁹</span> [this implies,] one, but not two. If so, 'that [man]' written in connection with offering up too? - That is required

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 215:24. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.